Duane Goossen: Tax cuts succeeded at starving revenue stream

Has the “real live experiment” in Kansas tax policy been a success? Did it live up to its billing?

If we simply judge whether it met publicly stated objectives, then, no, the plan failed miserably. But in another important respect, the plan achieved exactly what many lawmakers hoped for – the squeezing down of state government.

Recall claims from four years ago when Kansas decision makers dramatically lowered income tax rates and exempted more than 300,000 individuals from paying state income tax on “business income.” Citizens were told to expect a “shot of adrenaline into the heart of the Kansas economy,” a shot so potent that, despite tax cuts, the state budget would still balance.

After implementation of the tax cuts, all of that adrenaline talk soon turned sour.

Sure, Kansas has grown economically coming out of the Great Recession, but slowly. More slowly than our region, and more slowly than the nation.

In new job creation – a key measure for this experiment – Kansas ranks among the lowest 10 of all 50 states. Economic indicators show no correlation that the tax cuts helped Kansas boost its economy.

And state finances? What a mess.

The revenue loss from the income tax cuts put the state budget drastically in the red. In response, lawmakers raised sales tax rates twice, which transferred more of the state’s tax burden to low-income Kansans but did not come close to correcting the budget imbalance. Lawmakers also blew through the state’s reserves and transferred hundreds of millions away from highways and children to barely eke out a budget.

But therein lies the secret to the “success” many lawmakers really sought. If you want to cut programs and force state government to be smaller, starving the revenue stream provides the easiest route.

No politician wants to look a constituent in the eye and say, “I’m going to cut schools” or “I’m going to reduce maintenance on the highway you travel.” But with a tamped-down revenue stream, politicians can say, instead: “We have to live within our means.”

At the federal level, the “starve the revenue” approach does not work as effectively because the federal government has the ability to run up deficits and borrow money to fill the gap. Kansas cannot do that, at least not directly.

So in the name of “living within our means,” lawmakers cut operational aid for schools, then froze funding in place through block grants. State employees have lost benefits, and received no raises in eight years, leading to critical staff shortages at state hospitals and prisons. Maintenance on roads and bridges has been chopped, services for low-income Kansans cut off, Medicaid expansion turned away, and the Kansas Bioscience Authority demolished.

And it will get worse. Kansas cannot even afford the current scrunched-up level of spending. This year’s budget only balances by using large one-time transfers from other funds.

If you truly bought into the argument that giant tax cuts would lead to prosperity without hurting schools and highways, you’ve been had.

Meanwhile, those wanting Kansas to spend less, regardless of the consequences, have met success.

This story was originally published February 12, 2016 at 6:05 PM with the headline "Duane Goossen: Tax cuts succeeded at starving revenue stream."