Opinion Columns & Blogs

Candidates shouldn’t run their own elections

Secretary of State Kris Kobach spoke to the media during a news conference at the Topeka Capitol Plaza hotel on Thursday.
Secretary of State Kris Kobach spoke to the media during a news conference at the Topeka Capitol Plaza hotel on Thursday. AP

With the Republican primary for governor heading to a likely recount, Secretary of State Kris Kobach both leads the vote by a scant number of votes, and heads the office that will administer the recount.

Kobach also will serve on the three-member board that will officially certify the winner. The appearance of a conflict of interest is reinforced every time someone checks the state election results site, which is adorned with a smiling picture of Kobach at the top.

Whether or not Kobach is a good administrator of our state’s elections, he should not be both player and referee at the same time. As soon as the Legislature returns to work in Topeka next January, they should begin debate on distancing our chief election administrator from electoral politics, with a goal of a constitutional amendment by the time of the next secretary of state election in 2022.

The two major-party candidates to replace Kobach, Republican Scott Schwab and Democrat Brian McClendon, should commit to supporting a process of de-politicization of the office they seek.

While most states elect their secretaries of state, several appoint them instead. Appointment by the governor or Legislature still involves elected officials in the process, and holders of the office would still be connected to political parties.

Appointment, however, would at least keep the secretary of state from having to ask for support from the same voters whose right to vote he or she is entrusted with protecting. An upwardly-mobile politician like Kobach would likely seek out a different office to advance their career, and the secretary of state would function more like other appointed positions like commerce secretary.

An even more effective strategy would be to impose a “resign-to-run” requirement on the position. Many states have such requirements for municipal officials like mayors, and sometimes even state legislators. If we had such a requirement, Kobach would have had to resign months ago when he filed to run for governor, and the primary and recount would be administered by a short-term appointed replacement.

Resign-to-run requirements are a bad idea for most offices, because they can keep qualified people from running for higher office, or remove from office elected officials. It is good for Kansas democracy that Laura Kelly and Lynn Rogers will remain in the state senate if they lose the race for governor and lieutenant governor, continuing to represent citizens of Topeka and Wichita. Citizens of eastern Kansas will benefit from the three Republican state senators who unsuccessfully sought the nomination in the 2nd U.S. House district serving out the two years remaining on their terms.

The office of secretary of state is different, as its most important and most prominent job is to ensure that elections are free and fair. It is reasonable to require Kobach and his successors to give up the privilege of serving when they participate in the elections administered by the office.

Our current method for choosing our chief election official is yielding the worst possible outcome, with a candidate for governor supervising the process that will determine his career advancement. Kobach could serve our democracy by recusing himself from the process, but that would still leave his appointees and hired staff running the recount.

As Kansans we cannot fix this problem for 2018, but if we and our elected officials move quickly, we can fix it by 2022.

Dr. Neal Allen is chair of the Political Science Department at Wichita State University.

  Comments