Elon and Trump: Lots of losers in the spat to end all spats | Opinion
Editor’s note: Welcome to a special edition of Double Take, a regular conversation from opinion writers Melinda Henneberger and David Mastio tackling news with differing perspectives.
DAVID: Who could have imagined that a truth-challenged, philandering grifter and a drug-addled billionaire wannabe Mars colonist would find it difficult to get along while sharing the presidential limelight?
It is hard to see where Donald Trump and Elon Musk ever aligned much on anything. One wants to build a base on the moon while the other wants to sell Luna to the Saudis. One builds electric cars while the other wants to send them to the landfill. One sold out to China and the other is still trying to sell out to China.
More seriously, I think Musk came to Washington genuinely thinking that he could change the place, turning deficits into surpluses with hard-nosed, start-up management principles. That was never going to work out.
MELINDA: When two liars break up, who do you believe? Despite the headlines about their “remarkable” split, the single remarkable thing about it is that it took so long. There is only room for one diva in any relationship.
Musk is right that he got Trump elected and Trump is right that he did a lot for Musk in return, so the partnership, such as it was, served both of their financial interests, and who should complain? Oh, I know the answer: every one of us.
Now they want to tell on each other. Which is delightful and all, but I’m kind of surprised that Elon started by telling us that the reason we haven’t gotten to see the Epstein files is that Trump is in there. I mean, that’s been rumored for years, but how quaint that Musk thinks that after all we already know about Trump, anything that he might have done with underage girls would change any minds. Wouldn’t his supporters just say that he didn’t do it, or if he did do it, others have, too, and besides, David and Bathsheba?
I was with you right up until you said that Musk came to Washington to turn deficits into surpluses. Trump posted in pique — redundant, I know, because when else does he say anything — that the “easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon’s Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn’t do it.” Kind of a damning admission about how unserious they both were about going after waste, fraud and abuse.
DAVID: I think there was some element of self-enrichment from Musk. Trump claimed Musk went “crazy” over losing electric vehicle subsidies, but Musk has long said he doesn’t care about EV subsidies.. He repeated that in December. They’re a competitive disadvantage to Tesla which is really the incumbent electric car maker with competitors propped up by the subsidies though now Republican sources are saying he changed his position again. He does care about other subsidies though. Musk has always appeared to be for tax credits for solar power that help another of his companies..
MELINDA: What makes you believe that Musk was in Washington to impose order, when what he actually did was run around causing personal, national and global chaos, just like his boss? I’m sorry/not at all sorry for perseverating on the dead kids in Africa as a result of the shuttering of USAID, but since those shameful cuts were not really even some big money saver, what again was the point?
The Washington Post had a story Thursday about how, since then, our government has decided it will probably destroy $12 million worth of HIV-prevention medications and contraceptives it had already bought for developing countries. It’s going to waste in warehouses in Belgium and Dubai, and we’d rather trash these supplies than give them away, even though it will cost more to do that. Please name some concrete examples of Musk’s application of hard-nosed startup management principles, because all I saw was ruin without reason.
DAVID: In a startup when something is not working, there’s more urgency than with a big profitable company. One approach entrepreneurs take to rescuing a floundering startup is to break down the failing parts to the studs before you rebuild. Musk was busily doing in the federal government what he had done at Twitter/X and elsewhere.
Probably the funniest moment in this epic divorce so far is when Trump threatened to take Musk’s SpaceX contracts away and Musk replied that he’ll shut down the Dragon spacecraft manned and cargo version that NASA needs so badly for the International Space Station. The two spoiled brats are both threatening to take their ball and go home. If only.
MELINDA: Wait a minute, now Musk is a spoiled brat, too? A few days ago you liked him bigly, so I’m glad to see you coming around.
DAVID: I still like him bigly. The guy is still a visionary who is changing the world. One reason I still like him is that the beginning of the falling out was when Musk told the truth about Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill. It really is a “disgusting abomination.” And if there is anything that Trump cannot abide anywhere near him is a truth-teller who might commit accuracy again.
MELINDA: I don’t know why you keep calling him a truth-teller when you know he’s encouraged this nonsense about the nonexistent genocide in South Africa. Not much accuracy there. He is, however, telling the truth about some things now that he’s angry, for example about how tariffs will cause a recession by the end of the year.
DAVID: I fear you’re right about the recession. Trump truly has gone off the deep end. If he thinks he can run the country without his big money backers and truly change America, he’s kidding himself. The split with Musk is actually the second big split in the Trump coalition in two weeks.
Last week, Trump called the architect of the Federalist Society takeover of the judiciary, Leonard Leo, a “sleazebag.” Leo is the one who gave Trump his list of Supreme Court justices whooverturned Roe and defined Trump’s first term. And Leo is sitting on a billion-dollar investment fund dedicated to right-leaning political activism.
If Trump alienates all the big money in the Republican Party, he is going to have to spend his own to keep control of Congress in the upcoming midterms, elections that any reasonable observer will see as a potential blowout giving power to the Democrats in the House and the Senate. If the election is during or after a recession, all bets are off.
MELINDA: He can finally afford to break up with the big money, but I also think he’ll find some new Elon to fund him, hop around swearing fealty and then wind up bitter and telling tales. And are we sure that Trump is even the one who initiated the break with Leonard Leo? I keep thinking about how Trump once told Howard Stern that whenever someone breaks up with you, you always say that you were the one who ended it. What I personally want out to see come of this drama is to never hear the word “bromance” again.
DAVID: The political fallout isn’t all there is. This matters for business, too. On Thursday, Tesla stock lost tens of billions of dollars in value. While Truth Social didn’t go down as much, Trump has less to start with and a $100 million cut to his net worth is a blow.
If Democrats won’t buy Teslas because of the DOGE cuts you say were so deadly, and Republicans won’t buy Teslas because Musk was disloyal to Trump and blew up the tax cut bill, where does that leave Tesla’s thousands of workers and the dozens of companies that are suppliers to the car company?
Americans of all kinds will find that out when the Big Beautiful bill goes down in flames and taxes go up as is scheduled when Trump’s 2017 tax cuts expire. Even people with relatively modest incomes will get hit with big bills.
When elephants fight, it is the little people who get trampled.
MELINDA: We agree that the bill is a “disgusting abomination,” though not for the same reasons, and let’s talk more soon about who will get trampled if it doesn’t pass.
This story was originally published June 6, 2025 at 9:46 AM with the headline "Elon and Trump: Lots of losers in the spat to end all spats | Opinion."