Pat Roberts’ Senate win signals a Republican Party revival

Sen. Pat Roberts speaks to the media Wednesday, Nov. 5, 2014, at the Kansas Republican Party headquarters in Topeka, Kan. Roberts was reelected Tuesday after a tough challenge from independent candidate Greg Orman.
Sen. Pat Roberts speaks to the media Wednesday, Nov. 5, 2014, at the Kansas Republican Party headquarters in Topeka, Kan. Roberts was reelected Tuesday after a tough challenge from independent candidate Greg Orman. Associated Press

Kansas’ U.S. Sen. Pat Roberts defied dire predictions that he’d be swept out of office in a flood of anti-incumbent anger this week. Instead the 78-year-old lawmaker rode a GOP wave to victory.

His salvation signals a resurgence of the Republican establishment nationwide, a trend that comes not only at the expense of Democrats but also of tea party insurgents.

From Roberts’ defeat of independent challenger Greg Orman to Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell’s decisive win over Alison Lundergan Grimes in Kentucky to Thad Cochran’s re-election to a seventh Senate term in Mississippi, Election Day was a good day for long-serving Republicans, many of whom had come under attack from right-wing insurgents and disgruntled moderates alike as out-of-touch Washington insiders.

“It’s the triumph of old white guys,” said Jack Pitney, a professor of government at Claremont McKenna College in California. “If you look up the term ‘old white guy’ in the dictionary, you see a picture of Pat Roberts.”

That Roberts was able to win even though his roots in Kansas had withered and his campaign became stuck on autopilot in the immediate aftermath of the primary demonstrates the influence and effectiveness of the National Republican Senatorial Committee this cycle, said Nathan Gonzales, deputy editor of the Rothenberg Political Report, a nonpartisan publication that analyzes U.S. House of Representatives, Senate and gubernatorial races. Chaired by Republican Sen. Jerry Moran of Kansas, the committee is the party’s campaign arm, tasked with electing Republicans to the Senate.

“Sen. Roberts came into this year not ready for a high-profile re-election race, let alone two high-profile re-election races,” Gonzales said. “The strategists at the NRSC pulled him across the finish line in the primary, and then he put it on cruise control and they pulled him across the finish line in the general election.”

Moran’s campaign committee worked similar magic in Mississippi, where it rescued Cochran’s campaign from defeat in a primary runoff, Gonzales said.

“One of the surprises of the elections is that there wasn’t a senator who lost in the primary,” Gonzales said. “Based on the last couple of cycles, I would have thought there would be at least one.”

Republican national leadership was determined this year not to repeat the mistakes of 2010 and 2012, when the GOP lost winnable Senate races after its base nominated poorly vetted fringe candidates who were unable to close the deal in a general election.

This time, the Republican establishment – the party organization and outside fundraising groups such as the American Crossroads super political action committee – threw its weight behind more electable candidates in competitive states such as North Carolina and Colorado, and concentrated on shoring up endangered incumbents such as Roberts and Cochran.

New approach

The party’s new approach to primaries played out in Kansas this year in the August primary between Roberts and tea party candidate Milton Wolf. Republican groups poured money into Roberts’ campaign to get him through the intraparty election, and the national party’s opposition researchers unearthed graphic Facebook photos of gunshot victims posted by Wolf.

Roberts took issue Wednesday with the narrative that the national party had had to swoop in and save him.

“Nobody dragged me across the finish line,” he said at the party’s state headquarters in Topeka.

Roberts credited his victory instead to “old-fashioned politics,” referring to meeting with voters at town halls and campaign rallies.

“After they learned that the campaign was serious I don’t how many people came up to me and said, ‘You’re going to be just fine. You’re all right,’” he said.

In the end, despite bitter primary losses, many tea party voters appear to have fallen in line behind Roberts and other Republican incumbents they’d previously derided rather than risk Democrats holding on to the Senate majority.

“The tea party really became a part of the Republican coalition,” said John Hancock, a Missouri Republican strategist. “Both sides of that clash understand that we all need one another here. And when we come together, we win more than our share.”

Even in defeat, some tea party groups will find victory in pushing the winners toward the right. Roberts’ voting record, for example, grew more conservative as he faced re-election.

“The tea party conservatives are only going to be emboldened by the victories on Tuesday, even if their specific candidates aren’t the ones taking office,” said Gonzales, of the Rothenberg Political Report.

More important than party infighting on Election Day was the mutual goal of delivering a blow to the administration of President Obama. Roberts said Wednesday that the president was on the ballot in Kansas, even if his name wasn’t there officially.

But Republicans had to find a way to take advantage of the opportunities presented by Obama’s low approval ratings, and this time they did.

“What we saw in past elections was bad candidates bobbling winnable seats and botching opportunities,” said Pitney, of Claremont McKenna College. “That didn’t happen this time. This time they had good candidates and they were able to run through the door that Obama had opened for them.”

Contributing: Bryan Lowry of The Eagle and Steve Kraske of The Kansas City Star

Related stories from Wichita Eagle