Jean Chatzky says retirees get one big thing wrong about money
For most of your working life, the money advice all points one way. Spend less than you earn. Pay yourself first. Skip the upgrade and the impulse buy, and let compounding do the quiet work of building a future you cannot quite picture yet.
That discipline becomes identity. People who spend 40 years training themselves to save do not flip a switch the day the income stops. They keep the thermostat low, skip the trip, and watch the balance like a patient watching a monitor, sure that one wrong move drains it.
The fear behind it has a number. About 61% of adults worry they will not have enough in retirement, and 84% of Gen Xers describe themselves as "concerned or terrified" about the day the paychecks end, according to Penguin Random House.
Here is the twist that should change how you see your own nest egg. Jean Chatzky, the former NBC "Today" show financial editor and founder of HerMoney, says the biggest money mistake retirees make is not overspending. It is the opposite. They are too frightened to use the money they spent a lifetime building.
Why retirees keep underspending their own savings
The pattern is well documented. When I went through the research Chatzky leans on, the same finding kept surfacing. Roughly one-third of retirees say they will spend only the earnings their portfolio throws off, never the principal, because touching the balance feels like the first step toward zero, according to Fidelity.
More Retirement:
- Bank of America spotlights 401(k) tips you overlook
- Tennessee tax perks retirees should know
- Key social security updates you need to know for the rest of 2026
That instinct feels responsible. It often is not. A nest egg that only ever loses its interest can leave a retiree living like someone far poorer, eating into nothing while the years that money was meant to fund quietly pass.
Chatzky has been candid about this kind of self-defeating caution before, including some blunt advice about her own early 401(k) mistakes, as previously highlighted by TheStreet. The through line is that good intentions and real numbers do not always match.
Related: The reverse mortgage as a retirement lifeline
What guaranteed income does to retirement spending
The strongest evidence for her case sits in how differently people treat two kinds of money. A monthly check that arrives like clockwork feels spendable. A six- or seven-figure balance in a brokerage account does not, even when it is larger.
Retirees feel "far more comfortable spending from guaranteed income" than from their own savings, said Michael Finke, a retirement researcher at the American College of Financial Services, according to Fidelity. His work suggests that turning part of a portfolio into a dependable monthly payment can give people the confidence to spend up to twice as much, with no greater risk of running dry.
The research she draws on lines up across sources:
- Roughly one-third of retirees say they fear spending their portfolio principal and limit themselves to its earnings, according to Fidelity.
- Retirees are far more willing to spend Social Security and pension income than to draw down investments, a tendency researchers David Blanchett and Michael Finke flag as a planning problem, according to Financial Planning.
- 84% of Gen Xers say they are "concerned or terrified" about life after their paychecks stop, according to Penguin Random House.
This is the part Gen X feels most sharply, because the guaranteed slice of the puzzle has been shrinking for decades.
How a forever paycheck reframes the retirement math
That mismatch is the engine of her forthcoming book, The Forever Paycheck, written with AARP and out September 9. The premise is that you can shape your savings into something that behaves like a salary, then give yourself permission to actually live on it.
The hard part is not the arithmetic. "The day that you stop working is the most important day in your financial life," financial planner Hilary Hendershott said on the HerMoney podcast, describing the moment savers have to reverse every habit they spent decades building. Chatzky has long pushed people to automate the saving side so the money moves before they can touch it. The book argues the spending side needs the same kind of structure.
My read, after going through the numbers, is that she is selling a feeling as much as a strategy. The math already says many retirees can spend more. The book also points to research linking steady retirement income to better health and a longer life, according to Penguin Random House. The harder problem is believing any of it, which is exactly why framing the money as a paycheck does the work that a balance never could.
What it means for the way you draw down
The question most people carry into retirement is whether they saved enough. Chatzky's argument flips a more useful one into view. Will you use what you saved, or guard it so tightly that it funds a smaller life than you paid for?
That is worth sitting with before September 9. The fear of running out is real, and for some households it is justified. But for the saver who put in the decades, the quiet tragedy is rarely the empty account. It is the full one, left mostly untouched, next to a life lived smaller than it had to be.
Related: AI as a Force Multiplier for Retirement Services
The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
This story was originally published June 4, 2026 at 2:17 PM.