Last weekend marked the third anniversary of the Tahrir Square revolt in Egypt.
It’s hard to recall the incredible exhilaration of those days, which I witnessed firsthand: Facebook-savvy activists rallied millions to the square with calls to end police brutality and oust a military-backed dictator.
In 36 months, the counterrevolution has come full circle. Several key leaders of the Jan. 25, 2011, protest, including the April 6 movement co-founder Ahmed Maher, have been sentenced to three years in jail – at hard labor. Police brutality is back, but government-controlled media and TV label anyone who criticizes the police or military as traitors.
How did such a hopeful moment turn so sour? Here are some observations from a trip to Cairo last month, and conversations since.
Sign Up and Save
Get six months of free digital access to The Wichita Eagle
First, Facebook alone does not make a revolution. Liberal Facebook activists such as Maher were able to rally urban, educated crowds. But they were unable, or unwilling, to organize among the poor and less educated in rural Egypt, where shoe leather was needed. Nor were they able to organize strong political parties to counter well-organized Islamists. As the 25-year-old liberal activist Mohebi Doss told me over coffee: “The Muslim Brotherhood succeeded in reaching power because of liberals’ mistakes.”
Second, after the Muslim Brotherhood had frightened many Egyptians by seeking to monopolize power and Islamacize society, young activists again tried to unseat a government with street protests. Doss was one of five founders of the group Tamarod (Rebel), which campaigned to gather 15 million signatures calling for the resignation of elected President Mohammed Morsi. But the military generals then used Tamarod as cover to oust the president last summer and reinvent themselves as the heroes of the Egyptian revolt.
Third, most – but not all – liberals welcomed the army’s soft coup despite its brutal crackdown on the Brotherhood, in which hundreds were killed and thousands arrested. Conscious of their political weakness, liberals hope the army will move the country back toward democracy in coming elections. However, a new constitution strengthens the power of security services. And public adulation for Gen. Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, who removed Morsi, may ensure he is elected as the next president.
Fourth, the military and police seem bent on ensuring that the Egyptian street – so powerfully mobilized by the Tahrir revolt – will not unseat another government.
As a result, liberal activists who have dared to raise human-rights objections to military behavior or new curbs on street protests have found themselves in the crosshairs. Maher, who has met with prominent leaders in Europe, America and Asia, and been nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize, is now locked up in a freezing cell in solitary confinement.
Meantime, state media continue to defame onetime rebel icons, claiming that the Tahrir Square revolt was really organized by “foreign hands” and Maher and colleagues were foreign agents.
However, public opinion is fluid. If Egyptians elect Sisi as president, they will eventually judge him not on his current hero status but on whether the economy gets better.
If he fails to deliver, we will see whether the spirit of Tahrir lives on and people dare to return to the streets to demand a different leader. Or, even more important, whether the heirs of Tahrir have been able to organize an independent political party, and whether such a party can – or is permitted to – win.