Rape without consequence starts early in the military, if you believe the woman in a case now wending its way through the U.S. Naval Academy.
A female midshipman says she was raped by three football players at an off-campus party in April 2012. She didn’t remember much, but other students did, and there had been talk about it on Facebook.
So officials immediately swung into action: They punished the woman for underage drinking. The football players kept playing. And because Naval Academy rules require midshipmen to attend home games, the woman had to watch as her accused assailants were cheered.
Now, more than a year later, the case languishes.
Premium content for only $0.99
For the most comprehensive local coverage, subscribe today.
True, the woman didn’t push the Navy to investigate after one of the players begged her not to hurt the team. But she’d already given over the information, and it was up to the Naval Criminal Investigative Service to proceed. There was already damning evidence, from witnesses and from social media postings. There was no dearth of corroborating testimony.
And so it goes for too many sexual-assault victims in the military. The brass decries the violence but wants those who report it to accept the command structure and bow to authority. There is a lot of wringing of hands, but not of necks.
Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel calls sexual assaults a “scourge” on the military. Last year, the Pentagon received 3,374 reports of sexual assault, with the actual number estimated at closer to 26,000. Of those 3,374, almost 1,000 were thrown out and several hundred others were dropped by commanders as unfounded or for other reasons.
Something happens when a crime is reported in the military. Service members close ranks. The victim often has to continue to salute her assailant. Everyone publicly agrees the situation is dire.
This week’s Senate hearings about sexual assault in the military illuminate an awful truth: Beneath all the official declarations about the need for change is a more powerful desire to preserve rank at all costs, even if the cost is a crime spree.
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., has proposed bipartisan legislation that attempts to break this buddy system by taking the prosecution of sexual assaults out of the command structure. Uniformed investigators and prosecutors still would handle complaints.
But that’s not enough to reassure the brass. If their authority is removed in the barracks, their thinking goes, it is also gone from the battlefield. Without their support, this one tiny step for accusers could fail.
So much for today’s four-star generals. What about the next generation of officers graduating from the elite military academies? The news there is just as grim.
Consider the lawsuit filed last year by another female midshipman, a star soccer player from a military family. She says she was raped on two occasions by midshipmen after drinking. When she went to her Naval Academy counselor, she was not encouraged to report the rapes. When she became depressed and suicidal, she told her parents and reported both rapes.
She was a year from graduation but, according to her lawsuit, Naval Academy officials decided that the “mental-health issues caused by the rapes precluded her from becoming a commissioned officer.” Eventually, her parents and a member of Congress had to intervene to keep her from being sent to a mental institution.
Both of the accused rapists graduated and became officers.