WASHINGTON — Proponents of sex education classes that focus on encouraging teenagers to remain virgins until marriage hope that the rescue plan for the nation's health-care system will also save their programs, which face extinction because of a cutoff of federal funding.
The health-care reform legislation pending in the Senate includes $50 million for programs that states could use to try to reduce pregnancies and sexually transmitted disease among adolescents by teaching to them to delay when they start having sex.
Under the federal budget signed by President Obama, such programs would no longer have funds targeted for them.
"We're optimistic," said Valerie Huber of the National Abstinence Education Association, which is lobbying to maintain funding for the programs. "Nothing is certain, but we're hopeful."
Digital Access For Only $0.99
For the most comprehensive local coverage, subscribe today.
Critics of sex education programs focused on abstinence, however, are fighting to end funding permanently, saying there is clear evidence that the approach is unsuccessful.
"This is a last-ditch attempt by conservatives to resuscitate a program that has been proven to be ineffective," said James Wagoner, president of Advocates for Youth, a Washington-based advocacy group. "This is the failed abstinence-only model that research has shown is ineffective."
During President George W. Bush's administration, abstinence programs received more than $100 million a year directly in federal funding and about $50 million in federal money funneled through the states. But the effort came under mounting criticism when studies concluded that the approach was ineffective and signs indicated the long decline in teen pregnancies was slowing.
As part of Obama's first budget, Congress approved a request for more than $110 million for a new "teenage pregnancy prevention" initiative that would only fund programs that have been "proven effective through rigorous evaluation," which would effectively eliminate abstinence programs. The program would be run by a new Office of Adolescent Health in the Health and Human Services Department.
"This not only marks the return of science and evidence back to health policy but also provides a critical infusion of funding to implement comprehensive sex education and teen-pregnancy-prevention programs," Wagoner said.
The initiative includes $25 million for new, innovative programs that could potentially embrace those encouraging abstinence. But it does not earmark funding for programs focused on maintaining virginity. Some said the move was aimed at mollifying conservative critics, but Huber and others remained skeptical.
"There is absolutely no priority given to risk avoidance," Huber said. "So there is no certainty that even one dollar would go to this approach."
Huber estimated that more than 130 programs nationwide, serving perhaps 1.5 million youths, will lose funding by September unless at least some money is restored through the health-reform legislation.
"The tragic part is a number of these programs provide services in very at-risk communities where students don't have positive role models. They really depend on the mentoring and skills they receive through these programs," Huber said.
Funding could be restored as part of the health-reform package. Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, won inclusion of an amendment in the Senate Finance Committee bill that would provide $50 million to states to use for abstinence programs, and the funding survived the Senate version.
"It's appalling that Republicans are using health-care reform to continue their campaign to fund abstinence-only programs that don't work," said Cecille Richards, president of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America. Huber and other defenders disputed that studies had shown that abstinence programs were ineffective. They argued that research had shown the programs were superior to comprehensive efforts when administered in the schools.
In addition, they said, many programs were just beginning to gather data that would further validate the approach.
"It's disingenuous to use data from a clinic-based setting and say it will be effective in school-based setting," Huber said.