Trudy Rubin: World watches as slaughter goes on
11/12/2013 12:00 AM
11/11/2013 6:26 PM
Only weeks ago, the Obama administration was touting an international agreement to rid Syria of its chemical weapons as a diplomatic triumph. U.S. officials were predicting the deal would ease the way for broader peace talks in Geneva that would produce a transitional government without Bashar Assad and an end to the Syrian war.
They couldn’t have been more wrong.
The deal was a distraction that secured Assad’s hold on power and left him free to slaughter civilians with conventional weapons. (It also gave President Obama an excuse to renege on his promise to help non-jihadist Syrian rebels, even as Russia and Iran shower Assad with weapons and manpower.)
No wonder the Syrian dictator feels little need to compromise, and the long-awaited Geneva talks were postponed again. If they ever take place, it probably won’t be until 2014. Meantime, the focus on chemical-weapons inspectors diverts international attention from the urgent need to confront a staggering humanitarian catastrophe in Syria, which is about to get much worse.
More than 100,000 people have been killed in the 2 1/2-year-old Syrian conflict, including about 40,000 civilians (fewer than 1,000 died from the regime’s sarin gas attack). The bulk of the civilians were slaughtered in cities and towns by deliberate regime air and artillery strikes aimed at depopulating areas where Syrians opposed Assad’s rule. Let me be more specific: The regime targeted apartment buildings, mosques, schools and especially hospitals, killing families en masse and destroying the infrastructure for daily living. And the slaughter goes on.
Yet instead of being branded a war criminal, Assad is a full partner with Russia and the United Nations in implementing the chemical-weapons deal. He’s even demanding – I kid you not – that he be given armored trucks and sophisticated communications equipment to carry out the task.
Here’s the most infuriating part of the chemical-weapons accord: If Russia (and Iran) could make Assad cough up his poison gas – and open the way for inspectors to safely visit storage sites – they clearly could make him open the way for international aid workers to deliver polio serum, food and shelters to millions of displaced Syrians inside the country.
Yet Moscow stands ready to block any U.N. resolution that would compel Assad to stop targeting civilians and facilitate aid delivery. A toothless U.N. Security Council statement that called for Damascus to expedite aid has been virtually ignored.
And so Syria’s humanitarian tragedy worsens. Of 23 million Syrians, more than 2 million have become refugees in, and a burden on, neighboring Turkey, Iraq, Lebanon and Jordan. Many refugees are living in terrible squalor and are unprepared to survive another harsh winter.
As Secretary of State John Kerry wrote on ForeignPolicy.com, Assad is waging “a war of starvation” against his people. U.N. humanitarian chief Valerie Amos told the U.N. Security Council that about 40 percent of all Syrians need humanitarian aid, and 6.5 million are homeless refugees within their own country.
Cases of children dying of starvation are being reported in what was once a middle-class country. As if to prove how much worse things could become, there has been a small outbreak of polio in a rebel-controlled area, which could explode into an epidemic unless hundreds of thousands of children are vaccinated.
But Kerry makes clear that – beyond a generous U.S. commitment of $1.4 billion in humanitarian aid – the United States will take no further action to pressure Assad. He calls on “Assad’s allies” – Russia and Iran – to pressure the dictator and cites the chemical-weapons deal as proof that this could happen. Surely he knows this is a pipe dream.
“The world can’t sit idly by watching innocents die,” said Kerry. Not so.
Join the Discussion
The Wichita Eagle is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.