Andy Chou: Food tax credit won’t help poor
07/26/2013 12:00 AM
07/25/2013 5:14 PM
An ideal sales-tax base should have a broad base, be simple and have a stable revenue stream. Including food in the sales-tax base fits all these requirements. Yet a reality of taxing the sale of groceries is that it’s regressive.
A tax credit or a refund is a way to reduce the regressivity. Currently, seven states include food in their sales-tax base, and five of them include a credit or refund for food.
Kansas recently added an income-tax credit to compensate for the tax on food. To qualify for the credit, an individual must have purchased food in Kansas; have federal adjusted gross income for the year that did not exceed $30,615; and be either disabled, older than 55 or have at least one dependent child under 18.
Kansas used to have a tax refund for the tax on food sales. A credit is different from a refund in that a credit only reduces the tax liability to zero, whereas a refund can result in a check from the government. In 2011, individuals with income of less than $17,500 could claim a $90 refund for each exemption claimed on federal returns. Those with income between $17,501 and $35,000 received a $45 refund for each exemption. The Kansas Department of Revenue issued $59 million in food sales-tax refunds to nearly 379,000 eligible filers that year. The food tax refund for tax years 2013 and beyond was canceled as of early 2013 as part of the tax-reform plan. But six months later the food tax refund came back, albeit in a different form.
On the surface, it seems that the new tax credit is more generous than the old one ($125 for each exemption versus $45 or $90), but it has a narrower target. The problem with the new Kansas tax credit is that it won’t contribute to a refund, is applied after all other income-tax credits are counted (which minimizes payouts), and does not carry over to future tax years. According to KDOR, the effective income-tax rate of individuals in the lowest income group is minus 0.25 percent. A nonrefundable credit gives nothing to individuals with no income-tax liability.
Because low-income individuals pay little or no income tax, it is doubtful that this change will help low-income individuals as intended.
Join the Discussion
The Wichita Eagle is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.