Cal Thomas: U.S.-style democracy is foreign to Islamists
07/10/2013 12:00 AM
07/09/2013 6:18 PM
The military coup that ousted Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi marks another failure in U.S. foreign policy over several administrations, which have erroneously promoted the notion that American-style democracy in Islamic lands will produce a nation more like ours.
When properly read and obeyed, our Constitution guards against pure democracy and makes “we the people” subject to laws that cannot be abolished by popular vote. Benjamin Franklin properly called what the founders wrought a “republic.” Representative government would guard against the passions of a majority. No such safeguards apply in Egypt or, for that matter, most of the Islamic world.
Definitions are important. To a radical Islamist, Shariah law defines freedom. Constitutions guaranteeing equal rights for all (including religious minorities), multiple parties and free speech are mostly absent from societies where Islamists rule. And so majorities, often followed by the mob and then the army, rule.
Secretary of State John Kerry spent most of his recent visit to the Middle East focusing on the establishment of a Palestinian state. This failed policy is irrelevant to the turmoil throughout the region. The Obama administration is calling for an “inclusive” political process in Egypt that would include a role for the Muslim Brotherhood. But the Muslim Brotherhood’s radical religious outlook and earthly agenda are the problem, not the solution. Why should the United States expect a different government if a different “brother” is elected, or if Morsi is somehow reinstated?
How can Egypt have a stable government when the Brotherhood claims to be doing the will of God at the same time the military says it carried out God’s will by removing Morsi and secularists say they don’t want Islamists governing Egypt?
Writing in the Telegraph, Fraser Nelson, editor of the Spectator, said the Arab world needs capitalism more than democracy. He suggested that Western aid to Egypt be conditioned upon property rights. Throughout the Arab world, he wrote, bureaucracy and corruption keep many people from starting businesses without paying costly bribes: “The average Arab needs to present four dozen documents and endure two years of red tape to become the legal owner of land or business. If you don’t have the time or money for this, you are condemned to life in the black market: No matter how good you are, you will never trade your way out of poverty.”
The right to own property was fundamental to America’s founding. In the beginning, only white male property owners were allowed to vote. Discriminatory, yes, but the point about the importance of being invested in the new nation by literally owning a piece of it was thought to be fundamental to citizenship.
American policy in the Middle East has failed over many decades because of false assumptions, especially when it comes to Israel. While often treating that tiny land as a weed that ought to be dug up, rather than a flower in the desert to be nourished, U.S. policy has focused on placating Arabs and Muslims, many of whom wish to destroy Israel and America.
Perhaps now that the United States is rapidly headed toward energy independence (enhanced if the opposition to the Keystone XL pipeline and fracking can be overcome), this and future administrations won’t feel the need to bow to Middle East dictators and will push a “reset” button that has a better chance at succeeding than the one that for too long has been stuck and inoperative.
Join the Discussion
The Wichita Eagle is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.