To the millions of Americans unable to find work, to college graduates who can’t get a job and are living with their parents, to the underemployed who are working at jobs far below their skill set and experience, and to those who have given up looking for work altogether, a 7.8 percent unemployment rate is meaningless. The economy stinks.
Far more ominous is the rapid rise in gasoline prices in California – “40.3 cents more than a week ago,” according to figures from the AAA and Oil Price Information Service. The price is nearing $6 a gallon for premium and is more than $5 for other grades at some pumps.
It sounds like the plot of a disaster movie, which, in fact, it is. Timed perfectly to address public angst is “Atlas Shrugged II,” the second film in a planned trilogy, opening Oct. 12. One doesn’t have to be an atheist, like the book’s author, Ayn Rand, or a disciple of her philosophy of objectivism (which she described as “the concept of man as a heroic being, with his own happiness as the moral purpose of his life, with productive achievement as his noblest activity, and reason as his only absolute”) to appreciate the fictional warnings.
Though “Atlas Shrugged” was published in 1957 as a warning against centralized political control, the movie’s message is as contemporary as today’s news.
Never miss a local story.
The film’s producers describe the story line on IMBD.com this way: “The global economy is on the brink of collapse. Unemployment tops 24 percent. Gas is $42 per gallon. Railroads are the main transportation. Brilliant creators, from artists to industrialists, are mysteriously disappearing. Dagny Taggart, CEO of Taggart Transcontinental, has discovered an answer to the mounting energy crisis – a prototype of a motor that draws energy from static electricity. But until she finds its creator, it’s useless. It’s a race against time. And someone is watching.”
That “someone” is the government. Its “fair share law” limits production and, to borrow a modern term, seeks to “spread the wealth around,” thus stifling innovation, risk taking and capitalism. If Taggart finds the creator, government loses.
Democrats hail the 7.8 percent unemployment number without irony, having criticized the Bush administration in 2004 when unemployment was 5.4 percent and gas prices were less than $2 a gallon. They blamed Bush for gas prices then. So where’s the uproar over the nearly $6 per gallon now?
A Wall Street Journal editorial noted: “The reality is that more than three years into this weakest of economic recoveries, 12.1 million Americans are still out of work – nearly 23 million by the broader definition that includes those who have stopped looking or can’t find full-time work – and the labor participation rate is still down to 1981 levels at 63.6 percent.”
This is not cause for celebration.
The best course for economic revival is to fire the president. Re-electing President Obama will only give us four more years like the last four. Some of those working part time, or at jobs they cling to out of necessity, may well find themselves part of a higher jobless rate with dim prospects for their future.
If the Obama policies continue, “Atlas Shrugged” won’t be a work of fiction. It will be seen as prophecy.