Letters to the Editor

September 12, 2012

Letters to the editor on rail service, central command, libertarian redefined

“Rail service would triple investment” (Aug. 29 Letters to the Editor) cited two poor examples in arguing that rail service would be a benefit. A financial impact study is in practicality a political tool to justify a program, and a political person talking to other politicians is not a good character reference for the rail service program.

Related content


Editor's Choice Videos