Eagle editorial: Drone policies need scrutiny
02/08/2013 12:00 AM
08/08/2014 10:14 AM
The leak of a Justice Department document this week is raising concerns about the use of drones to kill suspected terrorists, including U.S. citizens. About time. The Obama administration has gotten a pass for too long on its use of drones.
The document contends that the United States can kill Americans who are suspected of being senior leaders in al-Qaida or are part of an “associated force” and who pose “an imminent threat of violent attack against the United States.”
However, there are many questions about who meets this criteria and when it can apply. “Imminent” threat, for example, doesn’t require a specific attack to be in process.
The Bush administration was correctly criticized for rewriting legal definitions to allow the torture of suspected terrorists. Yet there has been little attention to the expanded use of drones by President Obama. Is it wrong to torture a suspect but OK to blow him up?
There also hasn’t been enough scrutiny of the effectiveness of drone strikes. The administration has killed a number of high-level al-Qaida members, but the strikes have also killed innocent civilians, which has turned the public against the United States in key countries.
The Bush administration showed the danger of taking an ends-justifies-the-means approach to fighting terrorism and relying on shoddy legal arguments to circumvent legal and constitutional rights. The Obama administration must not repeat those mistakes.
For the editorial board, Phillip Brownlee
Join the Discussion
The Wichita Eagle is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.