Feds won’t block state laws legalizing marijuana
08/29/2013 5:35 PM
08/30/2013 4:41 AM
In a ruling that gives new momentum to the national push to legalize marijuana, the U.S. Justice Department said Thursday that it would not interfere with plans by the states of Washington and Colorado to sell and tax pot for recreational use beginning next year.
The department made its long-awaited announcement in a memo released to federal prosecutors.
Attorney General Eric Holder had been under growing pressure to respond to the new state laws, since marijuana is still classified as an illegal drug under federal law.
While pot opponents wanted Holder to sue the states to block them from selling a banned substance, the Justice Department said that it won’t bother, as long as the states police themselves well.
“Based on assurances that those states will impose an appropriately strict regulatory system, the department has informed the governors of both states that it is deferring its right to challenge their legalization laws at this time,” the department said in its announcement.
Advocates of legalization cheered the move, calling it a historic step toward ending marijuana prohibition across the United States.
While Washington and Colorado in November were the first to approve marijuana for recreational use, 20 states – with California going first in 1996 – have approved marijuana sales for medical purposes. Others are expected to vote soon on recreational marijuana, including Alaska in 2014 and California in 2016, lobbyists predict.
“This is the most heartening news to come out of Washington in a long, long time,” said Neill Franklin, executive director of Law Enforcement Against Prohibition, a group of law enforcement officials opposed to the war on drugs.
Holder had displayed “inspired leadership” by allowing the two states to proceed, Franklin said. “The message to the people of the other 48 states, to all who value personal freedom and responsible regulation, is clear: Seize the day,” he said.
Retired Seattle police chief Norm Stamper said the move had the potential “to be a major advancement in the history of drug reform” and would put more marijuana business in the hands of legitimate businesses and away from criminal organizations.
“For me, this means my fellow officers will be able to focus on their real job of preventing and solving violent crime, increasing their ability to do that job,” he said.
Opponents of legalization said the move would lead to a flood of negative consequences.
“We can look forward to more drugged driving accidents, more school dropouts and poorer health outcomes as a new big marijuana industry targeting kids and minorities emerges to fuel the flames,” said Patrick Kennedy, a former Democratic congressman from Rhode Island and co-founder of Project SAM (Smart Approaches to Marijuana), a national alliance that opposes legalization.
Kevin Sabet, Project SAM’s director, called the announcement disappointing but said it marks “only the first chapter in the long story” on marijuana legalization.
“In many ways, this will quicken the realization among people that more marijuana is never good for any community,” he said.
In Washington state, Democratic Gov. Jay Inslee called the move “good news” and said it came in a call made directly by Holder. In a joint statement issued with Washington Attorney General Bob Ferguson, Inslee said the two had assured Holder that the state would “remain vigilant” in enforcing its marijuana laws.
“We appreciate that the federal government will allow the voice of Washingtonians to be heard on this issue,” they said.
Dan Riffle, director of federal policies for the Marijuana Policy Project, a pro-legalization group in Washington, D.C., said the department’s move “is a clear signal that states are free to determine their own policies with respect to marijuana.”
And with legislation pending on Capitol Hill to legalize marijuana across the country, he added: “The next step is for Congress to act.”
While Washington state and Colorado got the green light to proceed with their plans, the Justice Department reminded prosecutors in its memo that Congress has determined that marijuana is “a dangerous drug” and that selling and distributing it remains a serious crime.
The department said it expects the two states to prevent the distribution of pot to minors; to keep state-grown marijuana within their borders; and to prevent any revenue from going to criminal enterprises, such as gangs and cartels. The states also will be expected to crack down on drugged driving, prevent the growing of marijuana on public lands and ensure that marijuana is not allowed on federal property, among other concerns.
Holder acted as pressure intensified this week on Capitol Hill for him to put an end to his long silence.
In March, Holder promised Congress that he would be issuing formal guidance to the states “relatively soon,” and it was becoming clear that patience was wearing thin – even among Democratic allies of the Obama administration – as Congress prepared to end its five-week summer break.
In the Senate, Democrat Patrick Leahy of Vermont, who heads the Judiciary Committee, said earlier this week that he wanted Holder to appear before his panel to answer questions on Sept. 10.
In the House of Representatives, Democratic Rep. Jared Polis of Colorado said it was “ridiculous that it’s gone on this long,” and he said it was time for Holder to resign if he couldn’t follow through on his simple promise to issue guidance to the states.
Holder also had angered pot advocates earlier this month, when he gave a speech to the American Bar Association in San Francisco without even mentioning marijuana. His new policy appears to be consistent with the views of his boss, President Barack Obama, who said in December that marijuana smokers in Washington and Colorado should be a low priority for law enforcement.
Nation & World Videos
Join the Discussion
The Wichita Eagle is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.