Chamber, Democratic Party fuel final campaign pushes

10/30/2012 6:44 AM

08/08/2014 10:13 AM

Big checks from a few well-known Kansans enriched the Kansas Chamber of Commerce PAC, which attacked Democrats and bolstered conservative Republican candidates across the state, according to reports filed late Monday.

The money is playing big roles in the Wichita area and across the state as the chamber tries to brand Democrats as supporters of Obamacare because of their opposition to a mostly symbolic vote on an amendment to the state constitution opposing a piece of the Affordable Care Act requiring people to have health insurance.

Some legal experts say such a vote wouldn’t allow the state to opt out of the federal health care law, as conservatives suggest and as the chamber contends in its attack ads. But conservatives say it could have sent the federal government a signal and potentially help the state’s legal position if a new challenge arises, although the U.S. Supreme Court has since ruled most of the law constitutional.

Meanwhile, the Kansas Democratic Party drew big money from its candidates’ campaigns and then redirected that money to blast Republicans and back its own candidates in key races. It spent $680,000 to fuel candidates’ campaigns and pay for attack ads, such as those that label conservative Republicans as bad for education.

Republicans have pushed back, saying Democrats’ claim that Gov. Sam Brownback made the single largest cut to education in the state’s history is bogus.

A series of cuts under Democratic Gov. Mark Parkinson amounted to more, they say. And they noted that overall education spending is up, including a $40 million increase in the most recent budget. But Democrats say that reductions in per-pupil base state aid in the 2011 budget total the largest single cut, and they contend that, even though Brownback’s most recent budget signature gave more in per pupil aid, more should have been provided to restore cuts made in the wake of the recession.

Democrats recently apologized for attacking Wichita Republican Rep. Joseph Scapa in a mail ad. Their postcard said he voted for the 2011 budget that included education funding cuts. He voted against that budget.

The Democratic Party’s $680,000 in spending out-weighs the Kansas Republican Party’s $302,000 of spending, and many of its candidates are also getting help from the Kansas National Education Association, which added $68,000 to the $630,000 it had on hand in late July.

Its recent money came from relatively small donations, as compared to the state chamber. It spent about $280,000, mostly supporting Democrats, and has $418,000 headed into the last week of the election season.

Meanwhile, Republicans got a lot of help from the state chamber.

The chamber spent $543,000 during the most recent campaign finance reporting that covers July 27 to Oct. 25.

Crossland Construction Co., headed by Chamber Vice Chairman Ivan Crossland Jr., and its affiliates gave more than $200,000 to the chamber’s political action committee, about $122,000 of which came as a loan. The chamber loaned its PAC $170,00. And Wichita oilman and Chamber Chairman David Murfin gave the chamber $80,000. Outgoing House Speaker Mike O’Neal, R-Hutchinson, is the chamber’s new president.

Koch Industries gave $50,000 to the state chamber. The Wichita-based company and the political operations it supports have been in the national spotlight because of David and Charles Koch’s impact bolstering conservatives and attacking moderates and liberals from local issues in Wichita to the presidential campaign.

Koch infused the Wichita Area Chamber PAC with $25,000, making up most of the $35,670 that PAC raised since about a week before the Aug. 7 primary. The PAC spent nearly all of that on conservative Republicans.

The visible PAC money makes up only part of the campaign finance picture. Candidates also raise a lot of their own money and make loans to themselves to pay for ads and operations.

Meanwhile, third party groups, including think tanks and nonprofits, can raise unlimited amounts of money without disclosing where they got it and can spend unlimited amounts as long as it’s not in direct support of a candidate. That’s often avoided by urging a voter to be aware of someone’s record and to tell the candidate what you think instead of direct advocacy, such as telling people to “vote for” or “vote against” a specific candidate.

The undisclosed money played a big role in the primary as local and national groups attacked candidates, helping defeat incumbent Republican Sens. Dick Kelsey and Jean Schodorf. Meanwhile, Wichita City Council member Michael O’Donnell, a conservative Republican, withstood a series of blistering ads from a third party to become the Republican candidate in District 25 against Democrat Tim Snow.

Read more here:

Nation & World Videos

Join the Discussion

The Wichita Eagle is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Terms of Service