Iowa, Nebraska leave Missouri River association
11/05/2011 12:00 AM
11/05/2011 12:09 AM
LINCOLN, Neb. —Iowa and Nebraska are withdrawing from an association of Missouri River states and tribes because of a dispute over how to manage the river, which flooded large parts of both states last summer.
Representatives for Nebraska Gov. Dave Heineman and Iowa Gov. Terry Branstad announced Friday the states would pull their membership from the Missouri River Association of States and Tribes. The coalition formed in 2006 to identify and resolve sometimes conflicting river management priorities among its members.
Branstad spokesman Tim Albrecht said the states are withdrawing in part because of a dispute with Montana over how to manage the river, and what they viewed as the group's unresponsiveness to their concerns. Iowa and Nebraska have pushed to release more water from upriver reservoirs in the spring to prevent the summer's extended flooding.
Montana Gov. Brian Schweitzer has said the more aggressive flood-control measures would infringe on his state's wildlife and recreation industries. He and Heineman clashed during a closed meeting of governors last month.
Branstad released a statement criticizing the Missouri River association for not pursuing more aggressive flood control during the group's recent meeting, and saying its bylaws don't adequately represent all the stakeholders and multiple river uses.
Association director J. Michael Hayden, a former Kansas governor, did not return phone or e-mail messages Friday afternoon.
The Iowa Farm Bureau has estimated the flooding cost $207 million in lost crop sales and related economic activity. Branstad said it covered more than 280,000 farm acres in Iowa and severely damaged or destroyed 380 homes.
Albrecht said the state would continue to work with other agencies and governments on the problem but going through the Missouri River association didn't seem to be the best way to do it.
Heineman also said the association didn't seem to be the best way to achieve his state's goals, given that "our highest priority is protecting our citizens' homes, farmers and ranchers, and businesses."
The governors have said they want to avoid a repeat of summer flooding that submerged thousands of acres of farmland, forced residents from their homes, and rerouted trains and motorists. Some cities, including Omaha, spent millions of dollars trying to protect airports, water treatment plants and other facilities from the rising waters.
Schweitzer sent a letter to the downstream governors last week, saying they were free to adjust their flood management plans as long as they left Montana out of it.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers manages the more than 2,300-mile-long river, which flows from Montana through North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Iowa and Missouri. Its basin also includes Wyoming.
Except for Montana, the states have all said controlling flooding is their top river management priority, Heineman noted in a letter to the association. They are trying to make that the corps' priority as well.
Editor's Choice Videos
Join the Discussion
The Wichita Eagle is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.