It’s likely that fires on two Boeing 787 Dreamliners were caused by overcharged lithium ion batteries, aviation safety and battery experts said Friday, pointing to developments in the investigation of the Boeing incidents as well as a battery fire in a business jet more than a year ago.
That business jet fire involved a Cessna Citation CJ4 at the Wichita plant in 2011.
An investigator in Japan, where a 787 made an emergency landing earlier this week, said the charred insides of the plane’s lithium ion battery show the battery received voltage in excess of its design limits.
The similarity of the burned battery from the All Nippon Airways flight to the burned battery in a Japan Airlines 787 that caught fire Jan. 7 while the jet was parked at Boston’s Logan International Airport suggests a common cause, Japan transport ministry investigator Hideyo Kosugi said.
“If we compare data from the latest case here and that in the U.S., we can pretty much figure out what happened,” Kosugi said.
Boeing Co. said Friday that it will stop delivering new 787s to customers until its electrical system is fixed.
The company said production would not stop. The plane is assembled in Everett, Wash., and North Charleston, S.C.
The Federal Aviation Administration has grounded the 787s until Boeing can prove the batteries are safe.
In the case of the 787 in Boston, the battery in the plane’s auxiliary power unit had recently received a large demand on its power and was in the process of charging when the fire ignited, a source familiar with the investigation of the 787 fire in Boston told the Associated Press.
The plane had landed a short time earlier and was empty of passengers, although crews were working in the plane.
The source spoke on condition of anonymity because he wasn’t authorized to speak publicly.
The FAA’s order on Wednesday temporarily grounded the six 787s belonging to United Airlines, the lone U.S. carrier operating Boeing’s newest and most technologically advanced airliner. The Japanese carriers already had grounded their 787s, and airlines and civil aviation authorities in other countries followed suit, shutting down all 50 Dreamliners that Boeing has delivered so far.
A battery fire in a Cessna Citation CJ4, a business jet, prompted the Federal Aviation Administration in October 2011 to issue an emergency order requiring the lithium ion batteries in all 42 of the jets in operation at that time to be replaced with a conventional nickel-cadmium or lead-acid battery.
The fire occurred while the plane was connected to a ground charging station at Cessna’s aircraft completion center in Wichita.
A letter from Cessna to CJ4 owners cautioned: “Do not connect a ground power unit to the airplane if you have reason to believe the battery may be in a depleted state … Do not leave the aircraft unattended with a ground power unit connected.”
The Citation was Cessna’s first business jet with a lithium ion battery as its main battery, and the 787 is the first airliner to make extensive use of lithium ion batteries. But the two are vastly different in size and in other respects, including their electrical systems, making comparisons difficult. Their batteries also came from different makers.
However, the three incidents – the two 787 fires and the Citation fire – underscore the vulnerability of lithium ion batteries to ignite if they receive too much voltage too fast, experts said. Other types of batteries may overheat if they are overcharged, but they are far less susceptible to starting a fire, they said.
“Other batteries don’t go this wrong when you treat them this badly,” said Jay Whitacre, an associate professor of materials science and engineering at Carnegie Mellon University.
There was one lithium ion battery fire during testing of the batteries while Boeing was working with FAA on certification of the 787, said Marc Birtel, a spokesman for the aircraft maker.
However, that fire was due to problems with the test rather than the batteries themselves, he said.
“There are multiple backups to ensure the system is safe,” Birtel said. “These include protections against over-charging and over-discharging.”
But John Goglia, an aviation safety expert and former National Transportation Safety board member, said, “it certainly sounds like based on what has been released so far that we have an issue of the battery charger or some other source providing too much energy to the battery.”
He said too-rapid charging might cause the flammable electrolyte fluid in the batteries to overheat, leak and catch fire.