Hawker Beechcraft submits another bid for Air Force contract

06/18/2012 5:00 AM

08/08/2014 10:10 AM

Hawker Beechcraft on Monday submitted its bid to the Air Force for a controversial light air support contract in a competition with Sparks, Nev.-based Sierra Nevada Corp. and its partner, Brazil-based Embraer.

The company said it hand-delivered the 8,800-page proposal for its Beechcraft AT-6 to Wright-Patterson Air Force Base.

"This is a high-priority program for Hawker Beechcraft and our AT-6 partners," Hawker Beechcraft chairman Bill Boisture said in a statement. "We are producing the most capable, affordable, sustainable and interoperable light-attack and armed reconnaissance platform in the world today, and this proposal will prove that fact to the USAF."

It’s the second time the company has submitted a bid for the high-stakes contract to supply planes to help security efforts in Afghanistan.

The Air Force reopened the bidding after Hawker Beechcraft challenged the award of a $354 million contract to Sierra Nevada, saying it had been wrongly eliminated from the competition.

The Air Force launched an internal investigation, saying it wasn’t satisfied with the documentation used to support the award.

Last week, Sierra Nevada Corp. filed suit in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims seeking reinstatement of the contract.

The company said canceling the contract was an extreme response to paperwork errors by the Air Force.

At stake is a contract that ultimately could be worth nearly $1 billion, depending on future orders.

Boisture said the company’s AT-6 meets or exceeds all of the Air Force’s requirements.

Editor's Choice Videos

Join the Discussion

The Wichita Eagle is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Terms of Service