High cropland prices sow fortune and worry
07/01/2012 7:44 AM
08/08/2014 10:11 AM
Mick Schmiesing strides into the local rec center in a plaid shirt, Massey Ferguson tractor cap and old tennis shoes. It’s auction day, and he’s ready to make a play for 80 acres of soil in Blue Earth County, Minn.
Bidding starts at $5,000 an acre.
A year ago, that would have been about the going price for good land in this southern Minnesota county. On this day in March, the bids climb much higher, past the county record set just a month earlier. After a few tense minutes, Schmiesing wins out with an offer of $8,375 an acre.
He looks a bit stunned — he just spent $670,000.
Is the land worth it? “I have no idea,” he says. “I’ll tell you in five years.”
Across Minnesota and the Midwest, concerns are rising that farm values are climbing too high. Farmers, bankers and investors have put huge sums of money on the line, in the hope that boom times for agriculture will last.
Land prices have reached levels not seen in a century, even adjusted for inflation, mainly because historically high prices for commodities such as corn and soybeans have enabled farmers to generate strong profits. Good times are spurring farmers to expand their holdings and newcomers to buy in.
But economists and analysts wonder whether farmland will continue to provide the kind of payoff that justifies the high-dollar purchases. Or whether farm prices are vulnerable to the kind of momentum shifts that hit dot-com stocks and then housing.
“If (prices) keep going up at the rates at which they have been going up, they will not be justifiable,” said Brent Gloy, director of Purdue University’s Center for Commercial Agriculture.
Farming’s last golden era also started with high commodity prices and a big run-up in land values – only to collapse into what became the 1980s farm crisis. Legions of farmers went bankrupt, and land values plummeted, devastating rural economies.
Many observers say farmers are at less risk this time because they aren’t carrying as much debt as they were in the ’80s. But signs of overinflated land prices have people on guard that the market may be peaking.
“As a conservative banker, I’m concerned every day,” said Michael Bahl, principal agriculture industry specialist at Wells Fargo Bank in Owatonna, Minn. He thinks Minnesota farmland that has reached $8,000 to $10,000 an acre is “too high.”
Purdue’s Gloy watches the “value-to-cash rent multiple” of farmland, which indicates how much buyers are paying for each dollar of rent they could collect for the land. A high number suggests that buyers may be overpaying.
The ratio hit a high in Minnesota in 2007 and remains at levels not seen in 45 years, according to a Star Tribune analysis of U.S. Department of Agriculture data. It’s at similar highs in Iowa, Illinois and Indiana and hasn’t fallen back in those states, according to Gloy’s analysis.
“We’re in uncharted territory,” Gloy said.
While farmland prices in the U.S. Midwest corn belt could be a “bubble,” some see more potential in the Great Plains, according to a Bloomberg News report that quoted Detlef Schoen, managing partner at Aquila Capital.
Schoen thinks new seed varieties and changing weather patterns could mean more regions of the country could be used to grow crops such as corn and soybeans.
Farming is the ultimate hard-luck profession, forever at the mercy of weather and faceless commodity markets. In recent years, though, the rewards for many crop farmers have been bountiful.
Sitting in his home office in southwest Minnesota overlooking two large shiny new steel corn bins, Gene Stoel sums up the past couple of years: “It’s been very easy to make money,” said Stoel, 57, a veteran corn and soybean farmer near Lake Wilson, Minn. “This has been a very good age for farming.”
Last fall, Stoel bought 160 acres, increasing the size of his farm by about a quarter. “You’ve got to keep growing, or you’ll be left behind,” Stoel said.
He paid $6,300 an acre. Three years ago, he bought an 80-acre parcel. It’s a little less fertile than his recent purchase, but it cost only $3,200 per acre.
Farmers entered a new price era about five years ago. Until about 2007, the long-term average price for corn – going back at least 30 years – was around $2.50 per bushel. Then prices for corn and other commodities began climbing in what experts see as a structural change driven by global food and fuel demand.
The thirst for corn-based ethanol has risen sharply. Plus, the swell of people entering the middle class in countries such as China and India has buoyed demand for meat, and thus for soybeans and corn for animal feed.
Growing world demand for food has come at the same time that global grain supplies have been tight. With subpar weather, U.S. corn yields have been below long-term trends in recent years.
The result: corn above $5 and soybeans around $13 – both off yearly highs but handily above historical benchmarks.
Said Stoel: “I never thought it would get this good.”
There are so many risks that Bahl, the Wells Fargo banker, joked he can’t list them all.
“Any one thing could cause that disaster,” he said.
Interest rates will inevitably rise at some point, although the Federal Reserve has made clear that it intends to hold rate targets low until at least 2014. Ethanol demand has slowed, and farm economists say that without federal policy changes, the days of go-go growth for the corn-based fuel are gone.
“Corn is land, and land is corn,” said Michael Swanson, an agricultural economist with Wells Fargo in Minneapolis. “If we have $6 corn prices going forward, these land prices are fine. We really need to have a couple of monster crops to see how low these prices might go.”
Producers themselves, and the age-old specter of such “monster crops” pose their own threat. Farmers worldwide, not surprisingly, react to higher prices by planting more, which in turn can lead to bumper crops that inevitably lead to price declines. U.S. corn farmers were expected to plant more acres in corn this year than any time since 1937.
“In the past, farmers have tended to produce themselves out of prosperity,” said Jason Henderson, an economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.