Voices of Faith: Are ancient dietary restrictions relevant in the modern world?
03/09/2013 12:00 AM
03/08/2013 8:48 PM
Kansas City Star
Rabbi Avi Weinstein, head of Jewish studies at the Hyman Brand Hebrew Academy : The question itself presumes a cultural bias, or even the misperception that the purpose of ancient dietary laws was somehow health related. Jewish commentators have long assumed that the reason for these commandments was not something that could be accessed by human reason and were relegated to the sphere of chukim — laws to be obeyed if not readily understood.
Any restriction on something as basic and fundamental as eating for an entire community has, however, certain consequences for those who observe these laws. It transforms not only the eating, but the preparation of food into a sacred act that binds the individual and the community . Preparation of food, including the ritual slaughter of animals are all performed within a devotional context. In fact, Maimonides, when writing his 14-volume code of Jewish law, places the laws of forbidden foods within the volume that is called Kedusha (Sanctity).
These rules, like many others, became a foundation for a culture that transcends the boundaries of nations and holds together a people that had been in exile for 2,000 years, when our only homeland was the Torah.
In contemporary life these strictures are still relevant because sanctity never goes out of style and changing realities don't change one's relationship to the Creator. The dietary laws remind us of who we are and that sustenance is an opportunity for devotion.
Mohamed Kohia, Rockhurst University professor: People of faith have been following certain dietary restrictions for thousands of years.
In the Bible, we can find that of the “beasts of the earth,” you may eat those that have cloven hooves and chews a cud.
Of the things in the waters, you may eat anything that has fins and scales, but not shellfish. Someone might claim those are Old Testament, so don't apply to Christians.
But Matthew said in the New Testament: “Do not think I came to destroy the law or the prophets … till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law.”
In Islam the Quran specifies a prohibition against eating swine and all pork byproducts, animals slaughtered in dedication to false gods, predatory creatures, animals that have been strangled, struck by an object or killed by a fall, or that are already dead.
Many view such restrictions, which also ban alcohol, as primitive and out-of-date, but following the holy books can have many benefits to the mind, the body, and the quality of life today.
There is no doubt that the body's arteries and heart appreciate a diet that cuts out bacon and ham. And notice, trichinosis, a parasite picked up from pigs, is far from eradicated.
Regardless of such benefits, the main reason that people of faith follow dietary restrictions of the holy books is simply because God said so.
Join the Discussion
The Wichita Eagle is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.