‘Tammy’ joins the list of worst movie titles
06/27/2014 3:20 PM
08/08/2014 10:25 AM
The title of a movie is very important.
It must pique our interest. It must evoke a mood. It must perfectly sum up what the movie is about.
So I ask you, does “Tammy” do that? (It’s a comedy starring Melissa McCarthy that opens Wednesday.)
No, it does not. I hate character names as titles because they tell us absolutely nothing about the movie. One-name titles are cop-outs – lazy writing and even lazier marketing. (I’m talking to you, too, “Lucy” — the upcoming Scarlett Johansson actioner.)
But it could have been worse. Way worse. Here, then, is a look at some of Hollywood’s worst movie titles:• “The Goods: Live Hard. Sell Hard.” (2009) — First of all, the clunky punctuation doesn’t exactly help it roll off the tongue. And it’s too long – it’s a title and tagline all smoothed into one.
• “xXx” (2002) — Type this onto your keyboard and you’ll get flagged for porn. So is it pronounced “X-X-X” or “Triple X”? Or “Exes”?
• “Thir13en Ghosts” (2001) — Unnecessary melding of the word thirteen and the number. It’s also d1stract1ng.
• “Our Vines Have Tender Grapes” (1945) — Sounds like a medical condition.
• “Live Free or Die Hard” (2007) — At least it wasn’t “Die Harderest.”
• “I Still Know What You Did Last Summer” (1998) — This sequel to the slasher hit “I Know What You Did Last Summer” is just wrong. Wouldn’t it be “I Still Know What You Did Two Summers Ago”?
• “$” (1971) — Symbols as titles are always tricky (just ask Prince). So is this “Dollars” or “Money”? Or “Cash”? It just doesn’t make any cents.
• “Sssssss” (1973) — OK, we get it. The movie is about snakes. But I can’t imagine saying, “Two tickets for ‘Ssssssss,’ pleasssse.”
• “ Alvin & The Chipmunks: The Squeakquel” (2009) — As if the movie isn’t obnoxious enough, we get the Chipmunk-ized version of the word “sequel.” This will only be cute to the target audience, most of whom can’t yet read.
• “Quantum of Solace” (2008) — This James Bond title pretty much made everyone scratch their heads. What the heck is a quantum of solace? I suspect that the words were chosen only so that the O’s in “of” and “solace” would form the 00 in 007 on the film’s poster.
• “Breakin 2: Electric Boogaloo” (1982) — Titles that rhyme are too overly cute. What would have happened if “The Exorcist” had followed suit? “Exorcist 2: Coming Back for You.”
• “Gigli” (2003) — If people can’t pronounce your film’s title, they won’t go see it. And, boy, did they not go see this one.
• “Ballistic: Ecks Vs. Sever” (2002) — It sounds like a boxing match.
• “The Squid and the Whale” (2005) — This is a dark, disturbing drama about a family being ripped apart by divorce. But it sounds like a cute kiddie cartoon. Totally misleading.
• “Cirque du Freak: The Vampire’s Assistant” (2009) — Maybe they were just trying to sound classy with the unnecessary French words, but the two-part title makes the film sound like it’s part of a franchise. Thankfully, it isn’t.
• “Don’t Be a Menace to South Central While Drinking Your Juice in the Hood” (1996) — Don’t make movies titles that are probably longer than the movie.
About Movie Maniac
The Eagle's Rod Pocowatchit offers his musings on the screen scene.
Reach Rod at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Join the Discussion
The Wichita Eagle is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.