Log Out | Member Center



Letters to the editor on political parties, Obamacare, Social Security

  • Published Wednesday, Nov. 13, 2013, at 12 a.m.

Letters to the Editor

Include your full name, home address and phone number for verification purposes. All letters are edited for clarity and length; 200 words or fewer are best. Letters may be published in any format and become the property of The Eagle.

Mail: Letters to the Editor, The Wichita Eagle, 825 E. Douglas, Wichita, KS 67202

E-mail: letters@wichitaeagle.com

Fax: 316-269-6799

For more information, contact Phillip Brownlee at 316-268-6262, pbrownlee@wichitaeagle.com.

Political parties still pose threat

In last week’s gubernatorial race in Virginia, the full-steam-ahead liberal got 48 percent of the vote and the full-steam-ahead conservative got 45.5 percent. That close result is a dark cloud hovering over the immediate future of the United States.

The extremists advocating for each political party have the country so sharply divided that everyone should seriously begin to consider that no good will come from it. For the sake of everyone’s prosperity, they had best begin working toward agreement on a host of things. New and fresh leadership must be found within their ranks, and found soon.

It is always wise to recall what the first president of the United States warned of the threat from political parties:

“They serve to organize faction, to give it an artificial and extraordinary force; to put, in the place of the delegated will of the nation the will of a party, often a small but artful and enterprising minority of the community; and, according to the alternate triumphs of different parties, to make the public administration the mirror of the ill-concerted and incongruous projects of faction, rather than the organ of consistent and wholesome plans digested by common counsels and modified by mutual interests.”


Rose Hill

Something rotten

Well, I’m a shameless Republican, but not shameless enough to lie (Nov. 7 Opinion Line). I got on HealthCare.gov and got a ballpark quote on a 62-year-old man without subsidy of about $3,710 per year for the silver plan. No information on the deductible or coverage is offered at this level of scrutiny, but the annual out of pocket is presented to be about $13,000. So that’s about $309 per month, not the $132 that an Opinion Line commenter supposedly is paying.

Something is rotten in the state of Denmark, and it’s spreading here.



Facing shortfall

I am 72 years of age and my wife is 69. Social Security is scheduled to get a 1.5 percent cost-of-living increase in January 2014. This is OK, but in the past three months my home insurance and utilities have increased $163 a month. The Social Security increase means about $38 more to my wife and me. That would leave a $125 “shortfall.” It seems to me this whole country is in shortfall – or bankruptcy.

The $17 trillion U.S. national debt doesn’t bother me much. The $125 less a month bothers me a lot.



Subscribe to our newsletters

The Wichita Eagle welcomes your comments on news of the day. The more voices engaged in conversation, the better for us all, but do keep it civil. Please refrain from profanity, obscenity, spam, name-calling or attacking others for their views. Please see our commenting policy for more information.

Have a news tip? You can send it to wenews@wichitaeagle.com.

Search for a job


Top jobs