Log Out | Member Center

76°F

97°/71°

Kansas lawmaker seeks fall hearing on court nominee

  • Associated Press
  • Published Wednesday, July 17, 2013, at 8:20 p.m.

— The Kansas Senate Judiciary Committee’s chairman said Wednesday that he hopes to have a hearing this fall on Gov. Sam Brownback’s next nominee to the state Court of Appeals under a new selection system that gives senators the power to block such appointments.

Chairman Jeff King said he has asked legislative leaders to schedule a daylong meeting of his committee in October or November. King, R-Independence, said he plans to question the GOP governor’s nominee to the state’s second-highest court and allow members of the public to testify.

But Senate Minority Leader Anthony Hensley, D-Topeka, questioned King’s proposal, noting that the Senate has another committee for reviewing appointments before lawmakers reconvene their next annual session in January.

Brownback is filling a newly created 14th seat on the Court of Appeals under a law that took effect last month that allows the governor to appoint the judges, subject to Senate confirmation. Under the old system – still in place for the Kansas Supreme Court – a judicial nominating commission screened applicants and named three finalists, with no role for legislators after the governor’s appointment.

“Setting the precedent of an open, thorough process is very important,” King said.

Top House and Senate leaders from both parties expect to meet July 29 to decide how many committees will meet this summer and fall and what issues they will study.

Brownback has until Aug. 29 to name his nominee to the Court of Appeals. Under the new law, the Senate will have 20 days once the Legislature convenes in January to act, or the appointment will be considered confirmed. The law does not mention committee hearings between annual sessions, which are scheduled for 90 days.

If lawmakers were in session, the Senate Judiciary Committee likely would consider a Court of Appeals appointment. But the Senate also has a smaller Confirmation Oversight Committee that decides whether appointees can serve until the full Senate can vote on confirming them.

Hensley said King’s proposal is unprecedented, and it might be wiser – and less expensive – to have the Confirmation Oversight Committee review the Court of Appeals appointment. King is a member.

“We’re in uncharted waters here,” Hensley said.

Subscribe to our newsletters

The Wichita Eagle welcomes your comments on news of the day. The more voices engaged in conversation, the better for us all, but do keep it civil. Please refrain from profanity, obscenity, spam, name-calling or attacking others for their views. Please see our commenting policy for more information.

Have a news tip? You can send it to wenews@wichitaeagle.com.

Search for a job

in

Top jobs