Appeals court Gov. Sam Brownbacks decision to conceal the names of applicants for the Kansas Court of Appeals is nothing short of outrageous. His misguided turn to secrecy disrupts decades of open-door access to judicial selection. It is another chapter of an ongoing attack on the states highly regarded nonpartisan judicial-nomination plan an attack that already has netted the governor too much power over what is supposed to be an independent branch of Kansas government.
Kansas City Star
Gov. Sam Brownback should release the names of applicants for the Kansas Court of Appeals. Brownbacks decision to withhold the names is bad policy and bad politics. State government in Kansas needs more transparency, not less. If Brownback has a serious political problem, it is a sense among many constituencies that he does not care what they think. Along with that sense is the fear now widespread that he intends to try to take over the judicial branch of state government to advance his agenda.
Winfield Daily Courier
State and national groups contend Gov. Sam Brownbacks decision not to make public the names of applicants for a new position on the Kansas Court of Appeals is a blow against transparency and shuts the public out of the selection process. They are right, and the Capital-Journal supports transparency in government and public participation. That said, no one here is surprised by the governors decision not to release the names, and no one else should be either. Like it or not, the law has been changed, and Kansas governors have the power to pick their nominees to the Court of Appeals without input from a nomination commission or the public. When a Democrat again occupies the Governors Office, we will be surprised if he or she doesnt act much like Brownback is now.
In his so-called Road Map for Kansas, Gov. Sam Brownback said: Government should always be accountable to the people. Accountability begins with transparency. While that sounded great, weve instead seen deliberate moves to keep Kansans in the dark. The most recent example came in the governors refusal to release the names of applicants for a new position on the Kansas Court of Appeals even though names of candidates for the court and the state Supreme Court have been disclosed for decades in Kansas. The governor vowed to run an open and accountable administration. Unfortunately, hes too often failed to practice what he preached.
Garden City Telegram
Common Core The anti-Common Core forces show no signs of abandoning their quest. For them, having education standards for K-12 public schools adopted by most states in the nation smacked of federal overreach. Unable to persuade enough state lawmakers either to drop the standards Kansas adopted in 2010 or to prohibit funding for any further implementation, opponents are now focusing on the tests that need to be developed. Kansans Against Common Core do not want the state joining in with others to create the annual examinations. The Kansas State Board of Education should reject the groups pleas. Its merely another attempt to derail a worthwhile process.
Hays Daily News