Fluoride fight has long roots, passionate advocates
Set aside the science lessons. The fight over fluoride is as much or more a clash of philosophy.
The day after Wichitans decided to keep their water unfluoridated, the winning side said it would now work to reduce fluoridation in the rest of the state and the country.
Voters in the city of Wichita rejected fluoridated water on Tuesday, as they did in 1964 and 1978.
3,543 of 3,565 precincts reporting
171 of 171 precincts reporting
669 of 669 precincts reporting
32 of 32 precincts reporting
39 of 39 precincts reporting
8 of 8 precincts reporting
15 of 15 precincts reporting
50 of 50 precincts reporting
289 of 289 precincts reporting
13,893 votes counted
As Wichita moves toward a vote Tuesday on whether to fluoridate its drinking water, three issues continue to arise in the public debate: whether commercial-grade fluoride is different than naturally occurring fluoride, whether the fluoride to be added to the water is pharmaceutical grade and whether the warning labels on toothpaste should be read as a caution against fluoridated water.
A chemistry professor who is against fluoridated water got a much warmer welcome at the Sedgwick County Commission than a pro-fluoride expert who spoke there two weeks ago.
Set aside the science lessons. The fight over fluoride is as much or more a clash of philosophy.
The pro-fluoride group Wichitans for Healthy Teeth said Friday it has received commitments from private donors for $1.35 million for start-up costs of adding fluoride to Wichitas water supply should voters approve that measure on Nov. 6.
If Wichita voters decide Nov. 6 to fluoridate the city’s water, surrounding communities will be affected, too.
With two weeks to go to the vote on whether Wichita should fluoridate its water, the two sides of the issue proclaimed doubt and certainty about it in a forum Tuesday sponsored by the League of Women Voters.
On Nov. 6 Wichita voters will decide whether to fluoridate tap water. Proponents say fluoridation has been widely used since the 1960s, will reduce cavities in young and old alike and save Wichitans $25 million a year in dental bills.
In a KPTS-TV forum Thursday, a dentist and lawyer argued that water fluoridation is a common-sense measure to save kids from tooth decay, while a doctor and chiropractor argued that it’s ineffective and unsafe.
The fluoride fight spilled over into the Sedgwick County Commission chambers Wednesday with about 20 people debating the benefits and risks of putting the cavity-fighting chemical in Wichita’s city drinking water.
Opponents of fluoridating Wichitas drinking water will get a chance to speak their mind next week with Sedgwick County commissioners.
Anti-fluoridation forces are objecting to a Sedgwick County Health Department fact sheet that they say is little more than a commercial urging Wichitans to vote yes when fluoridated water comes up for a public vote next month.
As Barack Obama and Mitt Romney prepare for a make-or-break TV debate focused on the struggling economy, tax policy and the national debt, Wichitans are prepping to debate fluoridated water.
An anti-fluoridation group said Monday that it’s planning to be part of a televised debate about fluoride on public television in October and is looking for two people to debate on the pro-fluoridation side.
Harvard University scientists say that Wichita voters shouldn’t depend on a research study they compiled to decide whether to put fluoride in the city’s drinking water to fight tooth decay.
The debate over whether to add fluoride to Wichitas water supply is likely to grow after the City Council voted last week to place the issue on the Nov. 6 ballot. People on both sides of the issue frequently cite scientific research to back their claims that fluoride can help prevent tooth decay or that it can harm health. In many cases, strong feelings about fluoride are born from personal experiences living with, or without, it.
If Wichita’s last ballot measure was as clear as mud, the next one will be as clear as a glass of drinking water.
An anti-fluoride group on Wednesday challenged the pro-fluoride group Wichitans for Healthy Teeth to a televised debate to be held by Oct. 17, ahead of a November vote on whether Wichita should fluoridate its water.
The Wichita City Council has decided to have a public vote on water fluoridation, an issue much of the country decided half a century ago.
A petition drive seeking the fluoridation of Wichita’s water supply has been declared successful, giving the City Council two options: either approve fluoridation or let the city’s residents decide in November whether they want it.
A local organization fighting for healthy teeth among Wichitans says it plans to present a petition for fluoridation of Wichita’s water supply to the City Council later this year.
Don’t expect the Wichita City Council to jump into the fluoride debate soon.
The push to fluoridate Wichita’s water is on again with two groups launching campaigns to improve oral health.